Note: this was first published on 2/10/17 but I have revised this many times, most recently on 12/2/19
Flu season is here again and, as always, we are besieged with ads for the flu vaccine on TV and radio, in grocery stores and pharmacies. It seems like every year authorities warn that the coming flu season will be unusually bad but we don’t know yet how severe this year’s will be. In the past decade, according to the CDC there have been an average of 25 million cases of influenza in the US each year, so about 1 out of 13 people will get it, though in the 2017-18 season there were about 49 million cases. However, when laboratory testing is one on those suspected to have influenza only about 16% of the time is it actually confirmed, so it is probable than the true chances of getting true influenza are less than 1 in 75 most seasons, with the others being “flu-like illness” rather than actual influenza. And the flu vaccine can not possibly prevent the 84% of flu-like illnesses that are not true influenza.
Influenza is a viral illness that can be quite severe. The term “flu” is used casually and people talk about things like stomach flu, but stomach flu is not influenza. The best description I ever heard of influenza was one that I heard in medical school, which is that when you have influenza you feel like you have been hit by a truck. It tends to come on quite suddenly, and people usually get a high fever, are exhausted and achey all over and unable to function, along with a sore throat and cough. It generally lasts about a week. While influenza can rarely be fatal, those who die generally die from secondary infections, especially bacterial pneumonia. There are 3 main types of influenza, Types A, B and C, though most of the seasonal flu epidemics are Type A. There are many subtypes or strains of the flu and these strains are constantly changing.
Public health authorities and most doctors recommend the flu vaccine as a main strategy for preventing the flu, but, unfortunately, a large amount of mainstream research shows that not only is the influenza vaccine largely ineffective, but that it may do more harm than good. There are many excellent articles reviewing the science on this, so rather than repeating the information in these articles I am linking them.
If you were to just read one I recommend this excellent summary of the science by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.:
Here is an article from a very mainstream source on the lack of effectiveness of influenza vaccine:
For the majority of you who are not clicking on those links now, the mainstream Cochrane Collaboration reviewed the best research and concluded
“71 people would need vaccination to prevent one case of influenza (95% CI 64 to 80). Vaccination shows no appreciable effect on working days lost or hospitalisation.”
And that is in seasons where the vaccine is considered a good match; as you probably know, there are many strains of influenza that circulate and every year vaccine manufacturers have to guess which strains will predominate. Since the 2014-15 season vaccine effectiveness has been estimated to be 19%, 48%, 40%, 38% and in 2018-19 29%, meaning that in recent years most of the strains circulating aren’t covered by the vaccine.
And it is even questionable if the vaccines are very effective in preventing the strains when they get them right because the virus often mutates during the process of manufacturing the vaccine! See
https://newspunch.com/university-pennsylvania-flu-vaccine-hoax/ for a discussion of this study:
Given the lack of sound evidence to support the effectiveness of flu shots it is very disturbing that public health authorities put so much effort into promoting flu vaccines. What especially concerns me is that the CDC is very adamant in recommending everyone get the flu vaccine when the best available science does not support this, and this is obvious to anyone who investigates the matter. So by doing this, the CDC destroys its credibility and in light of this it is reasonable to then question all of their other recommendations regarding vaccinations (something that, unfortunately, really does deserve to be questioned)!
This is an excellent essay by Peter Doshi from the British Medical Journal, who was a postdoctoral fellow in Public Health at Harvard at the time he wrote it, questioning the rationale for these irrational policies:
One of the problems with vaccines is that there tends to be a paucity of controlled studies on their effectiveness. A rare placebo-controlled study on flu vaccine was done in 2008-9, with 115 subjects age 6-15 receiving flu vaccine or a saline placebo shot. They were then followed for 9 months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of influenza between the 2 groups, but those who got the flu shot had 5.5 times the incidence of non-influenza respiratory infections (colds, sinus infections, bronchitis) than those who got the placebo vaccine!
I just learned about a 2009 study done at the Mayo Clinic that found that “children who had received the flu vaccine had three times the risk of hospitalization, as compared to children who had not received the vaccine,” a rather disturbing finding!
For more on this study see
There is also evidence that, while getting the flu shot slightly decreases one’s chance of getting the strains of flu included in the vaccine, it appears to actually significantly increase one’s chances of getting strains not covered by the vaccine:
Unfortunately many health practitioners (doctors, nurses and even ancillary staff like receptionists) are mandated by hospitals and medical practices to get influenza vaccines even though there is absolutely no research that suggests that this has any significant benefits for them or their patients.
A study published in Jan. of 2017, Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Workers: Critical Analysis on the Evidence for Patient Benefit Underpinning Policies of Enforcement” concluded “current scientific data are inadequate to support the ethical implementation of enforced HCW (healthcare worker) influenza vaccination.”
Thus, while I believe no one who knows the science should ever choose to get the flu vaccine, many who work in healthcare facilities and even some who work in schools are mandated by their employers to get the flu vaccine. However, there are options they may take; in some cases they may qualify for a medical exemption or personal belief/religious exemption, though in many cases those who decline are forced to wear a mask at their workplace during flu season. For those who have to get the shot, be aware that most flu shots have toxic levels of mercury in the form of thimerosal, but one can make sure they get the form in a single-dose syringe, which has no mercury. Another alternative to consider is the Flu-Mist spray, which, unlike the shot, has a live though attenuated (weakened) version of the influenza virus. This form can still have serious side effects and some people actually get a form of influenza from it, but I have heard that some people will put cotton and vaseline up their nose before taking the spray, then removing that as soon as possible while rinsing their nostril, to minimize the amount that gets into their body. This would appear to be a viable strategy for those forced to do this against their will.
(I am not formally advising this, just sharing information, and I would not share it if there was sound evidence that the flu vaccine significantly reduced the risk of those receiving it actually getting influenza and/or passing it on to others.)
This is a wonderful blog post by a doctor on the lack of efficacy of the influenza vaccine and how ignorant most doctors (and even some CDC officials) are on this important topic:
Not only does forcing healthcare workers have no appreciable effect on risk of them spreading flu to patients but there is evidence it may put their patients at increased risk!
A study published in January of 2018 had the very disturbing finding that subjects who had influenza despite being vaccinated both that season and the year before shed 6.3 times more influenza virus in their breath than those with influenza who had not had the flu shot!!!
A main gambit of Public Health authorities is that it is important to get the flu shot not just to protect ourselves but to protect others from getting the flu. This study suggests that getting the flu shot dramatically increases the risk of spreading influenza to those around us, as it has not been shown to significantly reduce our risk of getting the flu and those who do get the flu after the shot are much more contagious.
for the actual study.
That the flu shot appears to actually increase one’s risk of becoming ill and may make those who get influenza more contagious than those who don’t get it is reason enough to avoid it, but we also should consider the numerous side effects, many quite serious, that are caused by this vaccine. The most serious is death and there are a disturbingly large number of cases of generally healthy people dying within days of receiving influenza vaccine, and thousands more who get Guillan-Barre Syndrome, an auto-immune condition resulting in temporary (though at least many months) or permanent paralysis. I have been surprised at how many of my patients know someone who has suffered from this side effect.
“As of July 31, 2019, there have been more than 166,178 reports of influenza vaccine reactions, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following influenza vaccinations made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), including 1,673 related deaths, 13,373 hospitalizations, and 3,358 related disabilities. However, the numbers of vaccine-related injuries and deaths reported to VAERS may not reflect the true number of serious health problems that occur after influenza vaccination. There is evidence that only between 1 and 10 percent of serious health problems that occur after use of prescription drugs or vaccines in the U.S. are ever reported to federal health officials…
Published studies have linked the influenza vaccine to numerous serious adverse events including Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis, stroke, brachial neuritis, encephalopathy, arthritis, bullous pemphigoid, vasculitis, myocardial infarction, transverse myelitis, optic neuritis, Bell’s Palsy, and more.”
But perhaps the most important reason to be cautious about receiving this (or any other) vaccine is evidence that vaccines are often contaminated with live retroviruses. Retroviruses can cause life-long infections that undermine our immune systems.
This is a fascinating story- the person who discovered this, Judy Mikovits PhD, was asked to retract her findings after her research on this was published. When she refused to do that she was arrested and jailed and given a 4 year gag order by the court. She discusses this in her book Plague but summarizes her findings in this article:
It is especially disturbing that the CDC (and thus most doctors) strongly recommend giving flu vaccine to pregnant women, when there have not only been no safety studies but there is good reason to believe this practice is killing many babies in utero! And the majority of developing babies who are, fortunately, not killed by this vaccine are being exposed to the potent neurotoxin mercury at a time when their systems are most susceptible to it. This is insanity!
So, given that the flu shot appears to do more harm than good, how can one reduce their risk of getting influenza? A lot of it comes down to common sense: a healthy diet (esp. avoiding large amounts of sugar, which lowers immune function), a quality multivitamin, adequate sleep and stress reduction (exercise, meditation etc.) and minimizing exposure to those who are ill can go a long way to reducing risk of getting the flu.
Adequate Vitamin D is also very important; it is thought that cold and flu season occurs in fall and winter because many people are deficient in Vitamin D that time of year.
We get Vitamin D mostly from the sun but in fall and winter months in most of the US it is impossible for us to get any Vitamin D from the sun because it is not high enough in the sky. Most adults need to take 2000-5000 iu of D3 per day in fall and winter to achieve optimal levels of Vitamin D. See
Immune-boosting herbs can also help prevent influenza. My favorite is Andrographis, a herb widely used in Ayurvedic and Chinese medicine. One controlled study showed that those taking Andrographis 200 mg 5 tines a week had half the number of viral upper respiratory infections than controls. But there are also many other excellent immune-boosting tonic herbs, including Ashwagandha, Astragalus, Eleuthero (Siberian ginseng) and medicinal mushrooms including Reishi, Turkey Tail, Shiitake and Cordyceps.
N-acetyl cysteine, an amino acid (often labeled NAC) has been shown boost immune function to reduce influenza-like illnesses when taken preventively at a dose of 600 mg 2x/day.
But what if you have gotten the flu?
First a few words about the conventional mainstream treatment for influenza, the rather expensive drug Tamiflu (oseltamivir phosphate). There is surprisingly little evidence that this drug is effective. If you have true influenza and start it right away it may help you recover about 1 day sooner. However, when someone has flu-like symptoms to the degree that a doctor diagnoses influenza, studies show that it is only true influenza about 1/3 of the time and Tamiflu will not only have no benefit in those infections but may cause considerable side effects including all the symptoms of influenza. Plus some of the side-effects of Tamiflu are life-threatening!
While the flu can come on quickly, aggressive measures at the first sign you are getting ill may help head it off. One useful thing to try is Oscillococcinum, a homeopathic remedy. A mainstream review of research on Oscillococcinum by the Cochrane Collaboration concluded that there is sound evidence that Oscillococcinum does reduce the length of influenza:
Like all medicines (and even more so for homeopathic medicines) it will not help everyone, but some people experience magical recoveries. But since it may work best if taken as soon as one gets symptoms, I recommend everyone get some to keep in your medicine cabinet. It will stay good for many years (while the manufacturer advises taking an entire vial as a dose, that it a lot of pellets and a lot of sugar; I advise taking about 1/3 of the vial at a time and repeating that every few hours).
Another preventive strategy is taking Influenzinum which is a homeopathic dilution of the influenza vaccine, which, like the vaccine, is updated each year. This is available in various potencies though a good choice for most is 9c and one can take 3 pellets once a week.
Many swear by this though I am not aware of formal research proving it is effective. However, at the very least, unlike the actual flu vaccine it will not have side effects, will not make you more likely to get sick and not make you more likely to spread the flu if you do get ill.
Another good strategy, which also helps the most at onset, is high doses of Vitamin C. When someone is healthy they will usually only absorb 5-10,000 mg of Vitamin C. After they have absorbed all they need the unabsorbed C will stay in the intestines and act as a laxative. But the sicker one is the more C one needs so it is not unusual for someone with influenza to absorb 100 grams or more. It is thus recommended to take about 3000 mg every 20 minutes at the onset of illness until they get loose stools (which is known as bowel tolerance). Obviously it is wise to use Vitamin C in powder form when doing this; most Vit. C powders have 2-3000 mg per tsp. Once you determine how much you need it is advised to take that amount in about 6 divided doses per day. While doing this at onset may help head off the flu, it is likely to help at any stage, but, again, it is useful to have Vitamin C powder on hand at home so you will have it when you need it. Another good option is liposomal vitamin C, the best-absorbed oral form, discussed in the first link below:
A related approach requires the help of an integrative physician like me, who can administer Vitamin C as an IV drip. 50 grams is usually very effective. It takes 1 1/2 to 2 hours to do this.
One of the most powerful treatments for influenza also requires a physician. This is IV ozone, wherein a catheter is inserted in one’s vein, blood is removed and mixed with ozone and oxygen and then re-infused. However, this innovative treatment is not yet widely available and is fairly expensive, so I would reserve if for severe cases that have not responded to other treatments. As wonderful as it can be, something noninvasive and inexpensive like the proper homeopathic remedy may work just as well (this is discussed further below).
Extra Vitamin D is also helpful, esp. if you have not been supplementing. Taking 50,000 units of D3 a day for a week is reasonable. While one can get toxic from excessive Vit. D, for toxicity to occur one must take at least 40,000 iu/day for months to reach toxic levels.
Herbs can be very helpful as well. The best-proven is an elderberry extract known as Sambucol, widely available at health food stores. I recommend Organic Sambucus by Nature’s Way. See
The aforementioned Andrographis is useful not only for prevention but treatment. I advise 400 mg 2 to 3x/day (I like Paradise Herbs brand) or 2 droppersful of tincture from HerbPharm 2-3x/day (it is bitter so add to a little juice).
Lomatium is a herb native to the American West with a history of folk use for influenza and other viruses and may be the strongest herb for influenza. It is said to be especially helpful for Influenza A, which is the main strain that is currently circulating. It is quite safe, although about 1% of those who take it get a rash which disappears after you stop it. I advise 30-40 drops of the tincture 3-4 times a day.
Boneset (Eupatorium perfoliatum) can be another beneficial herb for influenza and can be taken as a tea or tincture:
Astragalus is a herbal tonic with a long history of use in Chinese medicine.
2 droppersful of the tincture 3-4 times a day is a decent dose:
Essential oils can also be very helpful, especially oregano oil, which is a powerful anti-viral. It can be taken as capsules or by adding the oil to water and drinking. However, this should be used with caution. For detailed instructions on how to use it see
The above article also mentions N-acetlyl cysteine (NAC) 600 mg 2x/day as reducing severity and duration of flu-like illnesses according to a 1997 study. At the very least NAC is a great expectorant, supports our liver and enhances our body’s ability to produce glutathione, an endogenous anti-oxidant and immune-booster.
Colloidal silver is another natural remedy that has anti-viral activity, though I prefer silver hydrosols, which appear to be even safer and more effective.
I recommend 2 brands- Sovereign Silver or Argentyn 23 from Natural Immunogenics (Sovereign Silver is widely available at health food stores) and Silvercillin from Designs For Health. A good dose is 2 tsp every 3-4 hours, best on an empty stomach, though if you have a cough it can also be administered via nebulizer: add 1-2 tsp into the chamber and breathe in the nebulized solution every 3-4 hours.
Another promising treatment for influenza is olive leaf extract. In vitro studies show that olive leaf extract can kill a wide variety of bacteria, viruses and fungi, including Influenza A, but there has been no research studies proving it works in humans. It does appear to be very safe and there are many anecdotal reports of it helping for the flu and other infections, but I do not recommend it as highly as some other remedies due to the paucity of research on it. Due to the lack of research it is also hard to recommend what dosage to take. It often comes in capsules that contain 500 mg, and is also available as tinctures. Taking 500 mg 3-4 times a day for influenza may be worth a try, though I would also include more proven remedies.
For the best summary of the limited research on it see
A favorite treatment that can be very powerful for influenza is individualized homeopathy.
Homeopathy is known to be very helpful for influenza, in fact the validated information on homeopathy’s success in the 1918 flu pandemic is still among the best evidence for the effectiveness of homeopathy.
It is documented that in the 1918 pandemic up to 30% of patients seeking conventional care died. However, almost all of the deaths were not directly from influenza but from secondary pneumonia. This was before the discovery of antibiotics, and undoubtedly western medicine today is much better able to successfully treat pneumonia. However, during the 1918 pandemic it is documented that those treated with homeopathy had dramatically better outcomes.
The following is a fascinating extract from an article entitled “Homeopathy In
Influenza- A Chorus Of Fifty In Harmony” by W. A. Dewey, MD that appeared
in the Journal of the American Institute of Homeopathy in 1920 (thanks to
Julian Winston and David Warkentin for this).
“Dean W. A. Pearson of Philadelphia collected 26,795 cases of influenza
treated by homeopathic physicians with a mortality of 1.05%, while the
average old school mortality is 30%.
Thirty physicians in Connecticut responded to my request for data. They
reported 6,602 cases with 55 deaths, which is less than 1%. In the
transport service I had 81 cases on the way over. All recovered and were
landed. Every man received homeopathic treatment. One ship lost 31 on the
way. H. A. Roberts, MD, Derby, Connecticut.
In a plant of 8,000 workers we had only one death. The patients were not
drugged to death. Gelsemium was practically the only remedy used. We used
no aspirin and no vaccines. -Frank Wieland, MD, Chicago.
I did not lose a single case of influenza; my death rate in the pneumonias
was 2.1%. The salycilates, including aspirin and quinine, were almost the
sole standbys of the old school and it was a common thing to hear them
speaking of losing 60% of their pneumonias.-Dudley A. Williams, MD,
Providence, Rhode Island.
Fifteen hundred cases were reported at the Homeopathic Medical Society of
the District of Columbia with but fifteen deaths. Recoveries in the
National Homeopathic Hospital were 100%.-E. F. Sappington, M. D.,
I have treated 1,000 cases of influenza. I have the records to show my
work. I have no losses. Please give all credit to homeopathy and none to
the Scotch-Irish-American! -T. A. McCann, MD, Dayton, Ohio.
We treated over 300 cases of influenza among the members of the Student
army Training Corps with no deaths.Gelsemium, Bryonia and Ferrum
phosporicum were the leading remedies. Only in those cases having had
aspirin was convalescence delayed and pneumonia produced.
One physician in a Pittsburgh hospital asked a nurse if she knew any
better than what he was doing, because he was losing so many cases. “Yes,
Doctor, stop Aspirin and go down to a homeopathic pharmacy, and get
homeopathic remedies.” The Doctor replied; “But that is homeopathy.” “I
know it, but the homeopathic doctors for whom I have nursed have not lost
a single case.”
Three hundred and fifty cases were treated and I only lost one.
Cora Smith King, M.D
Eleven men reported 3,600 cases with 6 deaths. My records show 750 cases
with one death.Gelsemium, Bryonia and Eupatorium were the remedies
In the Public Health service in New Mexico among the Mexican population
chiefly Veratrum viride, Gelsemium and Bryonia were introduced and
excellent results followed their use in influenza. No cases died under
While it is optimal to consult with a homeopath, one of my favorite things about homeopathy is that it is truly a people’s medicine, in that by reading about the symptoms associated with the most common remedies for flu there is a good chance someone can figure out on their own which remedy is most likely to help. It is very safe to try; if you try a remedy and do not notice improvement within several hours then it is safe to try a different remedy until you find the right one.
for advice on choosing the proper remedy. These remedies are widely available at heath food stores.
As mentioned previously, one treatment NOT to try is Tamiflu. This is a toxic and dangerous drug with many side effects and minimal benefits at best. See
Another treatment to minimize is drugs to reduce fever, such as aspirin, Tylenol and ibuprofen (Motrin/Advil). Fever is how our bodies fight infection; when we have a fever our immune system functions better and microbes do not survive as well. Thus, lowering fever sabotages our immune system and prolongs illness. Indeed, it is thought that one of the reasons people who saw homeopaths in the 1918 flu pandemic had such dramatically better survival than those treated by allopaths is that allopaths recommended aspirin whereas homeopaths did not.
Many people worry that fever can cause brain damage or other organ damage. This will not happen unless one’s fever exceeds 105 and that almost never happens (though there is some evidence that a prolonged fever of 104 may be hazardous).
The one instance where you can make a case for fever-reducers is if one is absolutely miserable, in which case you may want to take something to reduce your suffering. That is OK as long as you realize that while you will suffer less, you will likely suffer longer.
Obviously rest and plenty of fluids are essential (it is usually not an option to not rest if you have the true flu). Chicken soup has proven benefits too!|
One common mistake that people make is trying to do too much when you are just getting over the flu. One is often still weak and fragile and it is easy to get another illness if you try to overdo it, so it is wise to not overdo things when you are recovering.
I hope this advice helps. Remember, no matter how miserable you feel, you will get better and some feel that this is a great way for our bodies to detoxify and to exercise our immune system. When one does get the flu it usually provides natural immunity to the flu for many years to come.
If you enjoy this article please share it with friends and family.
You may also enjoy some of the other posts on this blog.
If you want to thank me with some financial support donations of any amount would be very welcome and can be made by going to https://www.paypal.com/myaccount/transfer/send
and entering email@example.com
PS I am really delighted that since I posted the revised version of this article 5 days hours ago over 5000 people have read it. Please share it with friends and family.
And I have now received a couple of generous donations which makes me very happy as well.
My favorite number is 18. Given that the average doctor’s visit costs well over $100 it seems like $18 is not too much for information that could prevent a serious illness or even save a life. If just one out of 18 people who read this had donated $18 that would add up to $5000 and believe me, that would make a huge difference in my life (another favorite number of mine is 108. If any millionaires are out there $108 would be a great donation, but $10.80 is an amount that would be most welcome and for those on a budget $1.80 or even $1.08 would be welcome- if one third of you donated $1.08 that would add up to a nice amount).
Most people think all doctors are rich, but I make less money than any doctor I know (despite the fact that I am fully booked 2-3 months in advance) as I spend so much time with my patients, strive to keep my rates affordable and see many people who are on Medicare, whose fees do not even cover my overhead. I do not own a house, living in a tiny rental and I drive a 13 year-old used car. I exhausted most of my savings when my wife was terminally ill for 2 years.
I did not create this blog for fiscal rewards but I believe that it is good karma to give out a bit of positive energy in exchange for valuable information, so again, any donations would be truly appreciated. I would use any money for continuing medical education, buying equipment to help my patients and subsidizing care for those who are indigent.
1/20/18 update: 0ver 6000 people have read this in the week since I have posted it.
I am SO grateful to the 2 people who made generous donations but was hoping more than one out of every 3000 people reading this would give a bit in return.
I don’t want anyone to donate if it would create a financial hardship for them, but would expect that most of you might be able to share even a token amount.
I will continue to donate many hours of my time to share health info online even if I never get any donations in return, as my main reward is helping others.
Whether you donate or not thanks for reading this far. Sending prayers and blessings to me, my daughters and patients would be another great way to send positive energy in return.
Thanks and Blessings!
Randy Baker MD